#player1 Dave Dave Wiegand #player2 Joe Joe Edley #title Dave Wiegand vs. Joe Edley, NSC Division 1, Final Round, Table 1, #ltarget Macintosh HD:jjc:nsa-web:board display:test game: #ltarget #htarget file:///Macintosh%20HD/jjc/nsa-web/board%20display/test%20game/ #htarget /games/nsc2000/6/ > Dave: EEIOPRR h4 PRIOR +20 20 #note Maven incorrectly suggests 8G ROPIER (18). > Joe: ADEEGHN 8h REHANGED +92 92 #note Maven agrees. > Dave: BCEEGLT k5 GETABLE +40 60 #note Maven agrees. > Joe: DHLOOQR 4f QOPH +18 110 #note Maven agrees. > Dave: CELOSUW 7g COW +24 84 > Joe: DLLNORT 11g TOLLED +7 117 #note Maven suggests L11 DOLT (bad given access to triple row and inference of S), or after simulation 6J RETOLD (playing a more defensive game). > Dave: DELORSU n2 URODELES +72 156 #note Maven agrees. The anagram DELOUSER is also a possibility. > Joe: ADEENRS 9b ENDEARS +68 185 #note Maven agrees. > Dave: EEMNUXY h11 OXEYE +69 225 #note Maven agrees. > Joe: AAIMOPY m2 MAYO +34 219 #note Maven suggsts 8A AMIA (31), but MAYO simulates slightly better in a short run. > Dave: IMNUTTW 12d UNMIX +30 255 #note Maven agrees. > Joe: ACEIKPS c2 CAPESKIN +92 311 #note Maven agrees, needless to say. > Dave: RTTUUVW m8 GUV +11 266 #note Maven suggests 13B TUTU (12) or trading tiles. > Joe: AAFGINT 2a FACING +32 343 #note Maven suggsts D3 TAFIA (39) > Dave: IRTTUVW 13a VIRTU +20 286 #note Maven agrees. > Joe: AAEIINT 1f ANTI +15 358 #note Maven suggests D4 INIA (26), which would leave the 1 row open. > Dave: AEFTTW? o1 sTEW +52 338 #note Maven suggests 14B FEAT (32), but STEW simulates better. > Joe: AEIIRZ? a2 FIZ +25 383 #note Maven suggests A2 FIZzIER (84). > Dave: AABFIJT i13 FAT +26 364 #note Maven suggests 14F JAY (29). > Joe: AEIOOR? a12 OVER +24 407 #note Maven suggests suggests L10 ADO (14) blocking ADJOIN. > Dave: ABIJNOS l10 ADJOIN +36 400 #note Maven agrees. > Joe: AIO? 15a RAdIO +5 412 #note Maven suggests 11A CIAO (13). > Joe: (BS) +8 420