| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Vincent_Van_Dover Vincent Van Dover
#player2 Noah_Walton Noah Walton
>Vincent_Van_Dover: ADHIOR 8D HAIRDO +28 28
>Noah_Walton: AEEFRUU 9I FEU +19 19
>Vincent_Van_Dover: DELTV L6 VELDT +18 46
>Noah_Walton: AEMRRUU M10 AURUM +16 35
>Vincent_Van_Dover: AJMU 12I JUMA. +28 74
>Noah_Walton: EEEEENR K11 E.EER +14 49
>Vincent_Van_Dover: IQ 9C QI +26 100
>Noah_Walton: EEGLNNO 15H GEN.O +21 70
#note LONGER sims better. Better lane, perhaps a situationally better leave as well.
>Vincent_Van_Dover: AGHS N12 SHAG +44 144
>Noah_Walton: AEEILNO 6L .OE +8 78
#note Maybe a bad choice. When I simmed a few plays with Josh, LIE and LIEN 10B were preferred. Still finding this turn frustrating to think about.
>Vincent_Van_Dover: BLO N8 LOB +22 166
>Noah_Walton: AAEFILN O7 FA +21 99
#note Again, my thinking is kind of muddled here. This time the sim likes FINALE and FINAL by quite a bit. I think I didn't like closing / weakening bingo lines with those, but maybe that's not important enough. The points are good, the R and the D are still available, and maybe AEILN just isn't good enough. I may get too worried about thinks like row 7 overlaps to block in spots like these.
>Vincent_Van_Dover: ?AINOPT 10B PINTAdO +83 249
>Noah_Walton: ACEILNW M5 C.W +21 120
>Vincent_Van_Dover: BDI 11D DIB +28 277
>Noah_Walton: AEIILNX 14C EXILIAN +71 191
>Vincent_Van_Dover: OTW 13C WOT +33 310
>Noah_Walton: EEIKOSY 15B KEY +37 228
>Vincent_Van_Dover: EGORSSY 4I GREYS +27 337
>Noah_Walton: DEILORS 5E SOLDIER +91 319
>Vincent_Van_Dover: IITZ 6B ZITI +35 372
>Noah_Walton: AACNPRV I4 ..N +4 323
#note Going for PRECAVA/PReCAVA. The main problem with this is that it seems pretty natural for him to block that even inadvertently. Still, it might have been worth a shot. Spread-wise, stuff like VAREC might be better, though GIN actually happened to work out well on that front too. Still, I think if I were put in a similar situation and playing purely for spread, I would play the VAREC-type choice over the GIN-type choice.
>Vincent_Van_Dover: ?ENNOST F4 N.S +21 393
>Noah_Walton: AACPRTV C3 VAT.C +26 349
#note Played pretty quickly, I think. VATIC is not optimal but looks good if he misses ThEREON. I think I considered column J briefly but expected Vincent not to see plays there, and prioritized playing quickly over exact calculation given that it didn't seem like he had an out I expected him to find.
>Vincent_Van_Dover: ?ENOT O14 NO +20 413
>Noah_Walton: APR 13H RAP. +27 376
>Noah_Walton: (?ET) +4 380
|
