| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Bing Bing
#player2 DS DS
>Bing: AEEEHQU 8G QUA +24 24
#note This was a tough call. It seemed barely worthwhile to play QUA, but I didn't feel very great about it. I don't know if there's any right answer here, but Quackle supports the play (although the 8F placement sims marginally higher). EH is an interesting alternative.
>DS: AGZ J6 ZAG +47 47
>Bing: ADEEEHN K4 HEAD +30 54
>DS: ACEFH 3I CHAFE +41 88
>Bing: ?EEEJNR L1 JE.E +54 108
#note Typical of what happens when the J is slotted in position 5: an easy, rack cleaning 33 points for opponent (not that there was any real alternative this time - I saw and quickly rejected the horrible dEJEUNER).
>DS: ARU 1L .URA +33 121
>Bing: ?BENPRY I7 B.Y +24 132
>DS: AELNPST 10C PLANETS +70 191
>Bing: ?EINPRY D7 REP.YINg +76 208
#note Thought I was missing something better here, and I was: uNRIPELY D4. This turned out to be much worse than just the 4 point difference as it gave up a convenient 30-point dump.
>DS: FIV 8A FIV. +30 221
>Bing: ADDIIKT N1 .ID +23 231
>DS: INORV 12A VIR.ON +13 234
>Bing: ADIKSTT A12 .ITA +21 252
#note DAVITS A10 looks a bit better here.
>DS: BGR B6 BR.G +13 247
>Bing: ADEKSTU H10 .USKED +36 288
>DS: OW B14 OW +19 266
>Bing: AEEOOTW C10 .O.E +21 309
>DS: ?AEORST L6 SEApORT +83 349
>Bing: AELNOTW 8L .WOL +21 330
>DS: DOU 13H .UDO +10 359
>Bing: AEINNTX N5 AXI.N +28 358
>DS: EGLOR E4 OGLER +25 384
>Bing: CEILMNT 4A MELT.N +22 380
#note This was a pretty weak move. CLEMENT (14F) probably would have given me the best chance to win, but as the tiles lay, that too would have come up short.
>DS: EIIMSTT 14J EMITS +27 411
>Bing: CINO 11K O.CIN +14 394
>Bing: (IT) +4 398
|
