| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Jackson_Smylie Jackson Smylie
#player2 Charles_Reinke Charles Reinke
>Jackson_Smylie: AEEIJTU H7 JEU +20 20
>Charles_Reinke: LLNOSVY 8D SLOV.NLY +65 65
#note C: If Jackson didn't give me an E I was planning on quitting the tournament right there. I bet nobody would have stopped me because it would have made the division even. Just saying. Nobody likes having a bye.
>Jackson_Smylie: AEHIRTU D5 THE.AURI +72 92
>Charles_Reinke: EIILRST C1 SILTIER +76 141
>Jackson_Smylie: ADIMOTZ F6 ZO.ID +39 131
>Charles_Reinke: EEFFPPQ 2B Q. +22 163
#note C: Blocking the 3x3 now and hoping B4 EFF stays open for next time (it usually will).
>Jackson_Smylie: ADMOOTW K4 WOOD. +24 155
>Charles_Reinke: AEEFFPP B4 EFF +42 205
>Jackson_Smylie: ?ADEIMT 1C .IDeMEAT +83 238
>Charles_Reinke: AAEOPPT J4 APPA. +37 242
>Jackson_Smylie: AEEGINO L3 NAOI +30 268
>Charles_Reinke: ACCEGOT G3 COCA +22 264
>Jackson_Smylie: BEEGITY M2 GEY +28 296
#note J: I know I kept a B, not sure my last two tiles. I think it was this. Partly didn't want to keep the G, partly didn't want to make n1 parallels too good (the B is v parallelable)
>Charles_Reinke: AEGORTX 2E OX +52 316
>Jackson_Smylie: BEIIKNT 11B BI.K +20 316
#note J: kibe seems reckless to give a big score on an otherwise dead board
not 100% sure this was my rack, I feel like I had a worse rack. maybe BEEIIKT
>Charles_Reinke: AAEEGRT 12A RET.A +18 334
#note C: I decided I wanted another bingo lane even though the game is even at this point.
>Jackson_Smylie: EEEINTT 2H TEE +13 329
#note (EFF)ETE is a cool, but misguided, use of these letters.
>Charles_Reinke: AAEGGRV A12 .AGG +18 352
#note C: I had to spend a considerable amount of time talking myself into this word because I'm not sure if I've ever seen it played.
>Jackson_Smylie: EIMNTUW 4F M.W +12 341
#note J: might be too premature... I'm thinking he has a blank a lot, and want to be proactive in getting a bingo down. Problem is that if we trade bingoes I don't win too often, so maybe I just play WIT now. I don't hit too often if I fish the W so I didn't like it. I could exchange UW which might be a better version of MOW, basically going all in on bingoing while charles doesn't. exch. MUW could even be better since M-starting bingoes don't play on row 13. I think WIT, the standard play, is fine here. I don't need to panic and I also should panic about taking this route where I may need charles to not bingo for me to win.
>Charles_Reinke: ?AEERRV 4A V.. +10 362
#note C: This is a decent fish and sims well, but 14A (G)RAVER is probably better because it outruns and the bottom row is hard for Jackson to hit (there's only one E left and only BH for scoring tiles).
>Jackson_Smylie: BEHINTU 13E BUN +15 356
#note J: I think I forgot about BUNN when I made this play - BUN is really going all in on me bingoing and not charles, unless charles bingoes immediately and I bingo out. With 10 in the bag, bun leaves 7, and if charles bingoes immediately I can out-bingo and win. I liked setting up my H with BUN. I didn't like BUT as much because there are 3 Ns in the pool and no Ts - EHIT is a fairly bingo prone leave. Q likes this
>Charles_Reinke: ?AEERRR H12 RARE +21 383
>Jackson_Smylie: EHIISST 14E SH +36 392
#note J:kind of have to play this now - I have to score decently so that if we both bingo I win. I'm actually in a pretty good position, timing-wise, since if I draw a bingo I pretty much always win.
I didn't like plays that may bingo more, like (G)HI or n1 HI, since his bingo might score too much for me to catch him.
>Charles_Reinke: ?DENNOR 15G R.DONNEd +59 442
#note C: I'll lose if Jackson has EIILSTU, EIINSTU, or EILNSTU. And if he sees U(RARE).
>Jackson_Smylie: EIINSTU 11H UNITIES +69 461
>Jackson_Smylie: (L) +2 463
|
