| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Alexander_Gozali Alexander Gozali
#player2 Joni_Rolis Joni Rolis
>Alexander_Gozali: CEIJNQU 8D CINQUE +40 40
#note 8D QUINCE better
>Joni_Rolis: ABDERSU E3 DAUBR.ES +72 72
>Joni_Rolis: EEEGHLM (challenge) +5 77
#note J8 SUBEDAR better
>Alexander_Gozali: AIJLOOU D4 JO +38 78
#note Surprisingly enough, D1 JAIL for 45 still slightly better
>Joni_Rolis: EEEGHLM F10 HELM +30 107
#note HEME in same spot slighly better
>Alexander_Gozali: ACEILOU G5 CLI.UE +25 103
#note G7 EQUALI
>Joni_Rolis: AEEGILT 7I EGALITE +63 170
#note The only bingo
>Alexander_Gozali: AEIORRS 13D AR.ORIES +62 165
>Joni_Rolis: DEINNVW O4 WIV.D +48 218
>Joni_Rolis: EEMNNOT (challenge) +5 223
#note O4 VINEWED
>Alexander_Gozali: ILNOPUV 12A VOIP +34 199
>Joni_Rolis: EEMNNOT A8 ENMO.E +33 256
>Joni_Rolis: INNOTWX (challenge) +5 261
#note 14J MOTEN
>Alexander_Gozali: AGHLNOU H1 LAUGH +40 239
#note 14J HOGAN still better
>Joni_Rolis: INNOTWX 14J XI +52 313
#note BEST, however
>Alexander_Gozali: ?INORYZ 15H bRONZY +94 333
>Alexander_Gozali: AAFFIIT (challenge) +5 338
#note The most intersting part. LOL. What quackle realize was, Alex tile is close to BRONZIFY. However the board didn't provide an oppoturnity to make it happen. However... By playing RONZ in 15I Alex can EFFECTIVELY block any play in that triple, score well (36 points) and make the impossible become possible. (Now, since RONZ is already in board, in perfect spot, and Alex leave with I, Y and blank, if Alex picked any B or F left), he will able to make non-bingo triple triple BRONZIFY with massive score. By this calculation, Quackle rated RONZ far far better move than BRONZY, with almost 58% winning chance, VS BRONZY with only 50.5% winning chance.
But.. Again I don't blame Alex didn't play the best when he play BRONZY. It sscore massively 94 points, and put him ahead Joni immediately. You have to consider that ALL quackle suggest are based on 1 assumption : You and your opponent are very very genius person which know all words and perfect anagramming skill. Again, quackle judging RONZ better by the fact leaving IY and blank still condusive for bingo because there are 2 L floaters in board (for -ILY suffix) and also 7-letters bingo spot in column B. However, which I stated earlier, quackle know all 7 and 8 letters using I and Y, and have perfect anagramming skill. While human are rarely study IY combination
Playing RONZ, for regular human can result not picking any B or F that needed to play BRONZIFY, and missed the bingo with I and Y combination, and resulting unable to win the game.
At least, this is an example why some scrabble master say that best move according to quackle sometimes cannot be the best, although it STATISTICALLY PROVEN. We as human cannot play as perfect as program and we can tweak best move by adding some factor such as the possibility of opponent making mistake, or even thinking out side a box, which sometimes need in endgame scenario. There are numerous times that the quackle cannot find a winning move in endgame, only human, with practice can do that
>Joni_Rolis: ANNORTW 9I WANT +21 334
>Alexander_Gozali: AAFFIIT M3 TAFF.A +24 362
#note K2 TAFFIA is better because AI leave VS II leave
>Joni_Rolis: AENOPRT B2 PRONATE +74 408
>Alexander_Gozali: ?EIIRSY 1H .YRIcISE +80 442
>Alexander_Gozali: BDGNOO (challenge) +5 447
#note The only bingo, and quite inhumanly
>Joni_Rolis: ADEKSTT F2 TAK +26 434
#note Both quackle and me are unable to find Joni's winning move
>Alexander_Gozali: BDGNOO A1 NOOB +40 487
>Joni_Rolis: DEST 14A STED +28 462
>Joni_Rolis: (DG) +8 470
|
