| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Marisa_Yuningsih Marisa Yuningsih
#player2 Christian_Oktavius Christian Oktavius
>Marisa_Yuningsih: GMU 8G MUG +12 12
>Christian_Oktavius: EGIMNPT J6 PIGMENT +78 78
>Christian_Oktavius: DDERRTT (challenge) +5 83
#note 9E TEMPING slightly better
>Marisa_Yuningsih: DEY K10 DYE +29 41
>Christian_Oktavius: DDERRTT 12G RET..D +16 99
#note Best, slightly better than exc DRTT
>Marisa_Yuningsih: AEOZ 11E ZOEA +30 71
>Christian_Oktavius: BDEJORT F10 J. +25 124
#note K3 JOBED for 37, the BORTED leave simple cannot yield reasonable chance for bingo to compesate the 12 points loss
>Marisa_Yuningsih: AK 12D KA +23 94
>Christian_Oktavius: BDEEORT C11 BODE +21 145
#note I5 BODGE for extra 5 points and leave same powerful rack leave RET
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ENO K5 EON +12 106
>Christian_Oktavius: DEHRSTU 7F UH +20 165
#note Again, poor calculation. Since there are 3 S unseen, 15A RUSHED is what quackle considered best. Should't too cocern about chasing bingo for next turn
>Marisa_Yuningsih: IPQU E4 QUIP +38 144
>Christian_Oktavius: DELRSTV 8A DERVS +55 220
#note BEST
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ACT L4 CAT +17 161
>Christian_Oktavius: AABFLRT B12 RAFT +35 255
#note ROKA* is not a word, no valid play come close to match the valuation of this phoney play
>Marisa_Yuningsih: FI 13L IF +13 174
>Christian_Oktavius: ABLLLOV B2 LOVABL. +36 291
#note BEST. Both B2 LOVABLE and B2 VOLABLE almost equally valuated.
In term of defense VOLABLE is more recommended since it make counter-play to triple word square 1A impossible.
Hovewer for some unknown reason, quackle place LOVABLE slightly better, giving me winning percentage roughly 96% than VOLABLE, with winning percentage 95.75%.
>Marisa_Yuningsih: INO C1 ION +12 186
>Christian_Oktavius: ?AEILSY 14H bAILEYS +84 375
>Christian_Oktavius: EIOORSX (challenge) +5 380
#note Highest scoring
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ALW 15G LAW +26 212
>Christian_Oktavius: EIOORSX 15N OX +29 409
#note Valuated best. 2nd best is D1 OXO for 27. The 51 points play SIX in 6D simply leave too poor rack combination EIOOR and only rated 3rd BEST
>Marisa_Yuningsih: EH M3 EH +17 229
>Christian_Oktavius: AEINORS N2 ERASION +78 487
#note Highest scoring, but quackle recommended 3E ERASION/EQUIPS with 76 points better than this
>Marisa_Yuningsih: AEGINRT O6 TEARING +90 319
#note And this is probably why... Since if I play ERASION/EQUIPS Marisa was forced to play her bingo in column N,score lesser, and enable me to counter her bingo using opened triple word
Her best bingo, O1 GRATINE, very beautiful parallel play scoring 98 points
>Christian_Oktavius: CEIITUW A8 .UCI +7 494
#note Again, this is not good play when playing against top player, and no doubt not a play quackle suggested. However when we play human we still have to guess what our opponent will play. Top master will easily finish the game with word like ROSIN, INTROS INORBS, etc, but regular player tends to play differently, so after almost 5 minutes, I decided to play DUCI, ignoring first TEW in O2, which seems to be obvious best play
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ?NORS 15M S.. +19 338
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ?NORS -- -19 319
#note And it works
>Christian_Oktavius: EITW 4E .I +11 505
#note And again, This may sound stupid play, but I was guessing that she may, probably play NORS*, hooking QIS and got challenge off
Other consideration why I don't play TEW first because it also give her easy 21 points STEW, although she don't clear her rack too
>Marisa_Yuningsih: ?NORS G4 NO +14 333
#note Wrong, but still, she didn't clear her rack so my risky play hoping that my opponent don't play best move pays off
>Christian_Oktavius: ETW O2 TEW +31 536
>Christian_Oktavius: (RS?) +4 540
|
