| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Matthew_Tunnicliffe Matthew Tunnicliffe
#player2 Patrick_Niesink Patrick Niesink
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: FOQSSTT -FQT +0 0
#note Well I'm glad the play isn't TOFTS, because I hated that. But I botched the exchange. Should just keep ST. I should reconsider my "Never ever ever trade an S." mantra.
>Patrick_Niesink: ACEILPR 8D CALIPER +78 78
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AOOSSST K8 SOOT +20 20
>Patrick_Niesink: ?AAEOTV D4 AdVO.ATE +74 152
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AENRSSY 12A YENS +48 68
>Patrick_Niesink: JNU J10 JUN +53 205
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AGIIRST F1 STRIGIA. +63 131
#note Seemed necessary at this point. I can maybe be more aggressive, since he's not likely to challenge at this score. Make something up through the P or Y?
>Patrick_Niesink: APZ C2 ZAP +32 237
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DEEEINO 2A DO.E +28 159
>Patrick_Niesink: GNR 4C ..R.NG +11 248
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EEINSUW 1D WI.EN +45 204
#note Don't necessarily need to phony here, but I liked my chances of getting away with it.
>Patrick_Niesink: HLLU I11 HULL +16 264
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EEEIOSU -EEIOU +0 204
#note I'll admit I was getting mad here. Should keep my head in the game and see that 14I LOUIE is quite reasonable. Exchanging isn't bad either.
>Patrick_Niesink: AHRR A8 HARR. +33 297
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ABDEOQS H12 BEAD +42 246
>Patrick_Niesink: IV 14F VI.. +15 312
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CEFMOQS 9G FEM +35 281
>Patrick_Niesink: ALTU A1 A.ULT +21 333
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CIOOQSW -CIOOQW +0 281
>Patrick_Niesink: X 11D .X +18 351
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: BDEEKNS 10J ..B +12 293
#note In the short term, this isn't going to bingo very often. But in the long term, I'm probably going to need a line like this open. It's a weird looking play, but it sims surprisingly well, tops in win% ahead of scoring plays like L9 DESK and C11 KNEED.
>Patrick_Niesink: ERT C9 TER. +20 371
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DEEKNNS J10 ...K +22 315
#note Great bingo odds here.
>Patrick_Niesink: UY H4 .UY +7 378
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DEENNQS -Q +0 315
>Patrick_Niesink: DEIOT J3 EDITO. +9 387
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DEEENNS 6H .E. +6 321
#note Maybe I was too enamored with this particular leave, but I don't see how the top-simming play K1 DENE is supposed to work. I didn't want to do anything that made it easy for him to play down the L column, thus weakening my bingo lane.
>Patrick_Niesink: IQ B7 QI +16 403
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ADEENNS M4 ENNEADS +74 395
>Patrick_Niesink: ?GIIMOW L2 MOW +26 429
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CFOO K4 OF +28 423
>Patrick_Niesink: ?GII A8 .....InG +42 471
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CO 15H .OC +14 437
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: (I) +2 439
|
