| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Mike Mike
#player2 Noah Noah
>Mike: EEIILRV H7 RELIEVI +78 78
>Mike: EEIILRV -- -78 0
#note After a handshake, Mike expressed hope that this game would be better than the last. I looked back quizzically, because I thought the last game was decent, if not great.
>Noah: AEEOSVY 8H VOE +12 12
#note This really hampers Mike on his next play.
>Mike: EEIILRV H6 VI.E +10 10
>Noah: AAEGKSY 9G K.Y +28 40
>Mike: EILOR 6F LO.ER +12 22
>Noah: AAEGNSS J1 SANGA.E.S +73 113
>Mike: AIOOR 1F ARIO.O +18 40
>Noah: BCEMUUW 3I U.MEW +22 135
#note This was a frustrating decision. Every play keeps a bad leave and leaves something to be desired in terms of board shape. WEB 5E seemed like the most closed play, but the position wasn't nearly good enough to justify keeping CMUU.
>Mike: IIIII -IIIII +0 40
>Noah: AABCDIU E3 ABACI +29 164
#note Didn't think of DAUB/BAUD 2L, which are better because they block the (UNMEW)S hook and give me a chance to block the bottom of the board using the C(LOVER) hook next turn.
>Mike: ENO 4J .ONE +23 63
>Noah: ADINRTU 4C DU. +12 176
>Mike: LOO 7C OL.O +7 70
>Noah: ACEINRT K3 ..A +14 190
>Mike: DEZ 8A ZED +42 112
>Noah: CEINNRT M3 ..N +6 196
#note Thought of the homeless EN(A)TIC, but not ENACT, which looks correct.
>Mike: FLT B7 F.LT +17 129
>Noah: CEGINRT N4 REC +19 215
>Mike: EESX O1 EXES +44 173
>Noah: AFGINTY N1 FA +33 248
#note GINTY seemed better than FGINT in this position, but I could be wrong.
>Mike: IIIII -IIIII +0 173
>Noah: ?BGINTY F1 .BY +19 267
>Mike: OQU C1 QUO. +28 201
>Noah: ?GGINPT 2B P.G +12 279
>Mike: AIN 10E ANI +11 212
>Noah: ?GIMNRT 11E MaRTING +102 381
>Mike: ENPTUW A10 UNWEPT +47 259
>Noah: HILRSTT H11 .HIRL +36 417
>Mike: ADHJ 13D HADJ. +24 283
>Noah: ?ERSTTT 15D TaTT.ERS +58 475
>Noah: (DIII) +10 485
|
